Learn more about my book: Stoic Self Confidence, on sale now.
Most advice about holding people accountable quickly moves to progressive guidance. Set the expectation, document the gap, escalate to discipline. The mechanics are not wrong. They are just second, and when a leader reaches for them first they usually do not work.
They don’t work because accountability is not perceived the same way by everyone. The same conversation, using the same words, can be help for one employee and a threat for another. The difference is whether that employee trusts me, and that needs to happen long before I sit down with potential progressive discipline.
If they do not trust me, accountability is not a correction. It is the first step in getting rid of them, and that is how they will hear it no matter how carefully I say it. Once someone believes I am building a case, nothing useful happens after that. They stop listening for what needs to change and start thinking about their defense.
Real continuous improvement is a discipline. It runs on tools, structured frameworks and real data that tell you exactly where to look, what to fix, and how to know whether what you did actually worked. When I replace gut feel with a repeatable method, things shift. Problems get solved faster. Waste gets eliminated at the source instead of patched over. We stop having the same conversations about the same problems.
I wrote this book because I have spent nearly three decades leading teams in environmental services that do not allow for hesitation. The Stoics understood what hospital corridors and operating pressures teach you every day: character is not what you claim. It is what you do when things are hard.
Mixing stations introduce variables that many cleaning programs don’t account for. Water pressure fluctuates throughout the day and across different locations in the building. Dispensers require regular maintenance to stay calibrated. Metering tips clog. One common dilution station manufacturer states water pressure minimum of 30lbs. That explained why I had a dispenser never meet standards of 800ppm, and after I had changed it out.
Most of the data reviewed in healthcare operations meetings is historical. The reports look current because they were just printed, but the outcomes they describe were already determined days, weeks, or months before anyone sat down to discuss them. That is the nature of lagging data, and it is how most organizations are running.
I have sat in those meetings. Everyone is looking at the same numbers, agreeing on the same trends, and calling it management. What it actually is, most of the time, is documentation.
There are two reasons to invest in data, and most organizations have only committed to one of them. The first is protection: making sure the data is accurate, consistent, and trustworthy enough that compliance reports hold up under scrutiny, quality metrics reflect what is actually happening on the floor, and the right information reaches the right people when it matters. That is the defensive side of data, and it keeps you out of trouble.
The second reason is improvement. Once you have data you can trust, what you do with it matters just as much. Spotting trends before they become problems, allocating resources based on evidence rather than tradition, adjusting your approach when the numbers tell you something is not working: that is the offensive side, and it is where most departments fall short.
The financial pressure in healthcare right now is not a temporary condition. Margins are thinner than they have been in years, the scrutiny on every cost center is sharper, and the departments that cannot tell their story in the language of finance are finding themselves on the wrong side of the budget conversation.
The departments that hold their ground are not always the ones with the best outcomes. They are the ones with the best data, and there is a real difference between those two things.
If you work in EVS leadership and have not looked into the CHESP, the CMIP, or the T-CNACC, start. Not for the credential. For what the learning does to how you see your own work.
Most people think the hardship is the thing that happened to them. It is not. The hardship that does the most damage is the one that comes second. The first wave arrives uninvited. You do not choose it. It lands, and you absorb it. As brutal as it is, it has an end. Time helps, support helps, resilience helps, and you get through it. The second wave is different. It does not come from the outside. It comes from inside. It is the story you tell yourself about what happened and why.
Reactive versus Strategic Thinking. The choice is yours.
I am a Director of Environmental Services with 28 years in healthcare. I spend my days thinking about disinfection protocols, staffing assignments, infection prevention, and regulatory compliance. That is the work I love.
And I write novels.